IRS Plans More Audits of Wealthy Taxpayers

Over the last five years, the number of IRS examinations of individual income tax returns has declined across all income levels. This is due in large part to the IRS having suffered from budget cuts. The chart below shows the percentage of tax returns audited from 2011 to 2015.

Income Level
Year All Individuals Under $200,000 Above $200,000 Above 1,000,000
2015 0.84% 0.76% 2.61% 9.55%
2014 0.86% 0.78% 2.71% 7.50%
2013 0.96% 0.68% 3.26% 10.85%
2012 1.03% 0.94% 3.70% 12.14%
2011 1.11% 1.02% 3.93% 12.48%

Most IRS examinations of tax returns are correspondence audits rather than face-to-face audits. The IRS matches income amounts, which includes information reported by payers of income, to the amounts reported on personal income tax returns and sends notices with proposed adjustments to the tax bill if the amounts do not match up. Information reported to the IRS by payers of income includes wages, interest, dividends, stock sales, and real estate sales proceeds, among other sources of income. It’s important to point out that the IRS is not always correct, so those who receive a notice from the IRS on a proposed tax increase should never automatically agree.

In addition to examinations that result from income matching, the IRS has a secret scoring system it uses to identify tax returns to audit, called the Discriminant Inventory Function (DIF) system. The higher the DIF score, the more likely a tax return will be audited. DIF scoring rates certain items in a tax return higher, such as home office deductions and hobby losses. The IRS also measures average deductions for each income level and uses that information in their DIF scoring. Data gathered from related party tax returns that were subject to examination is also used to determine if a tax return should be audited.

The IRS is planning to increase its auditing efforts, especially for higher income taxpayers. IRS has not tipped its hand on what they will specifically be looking for, but we expect the list to at the very least include the following:

  • Large charitable deductions. There are specific documentation requirements for deducting charitable contributions, especially for noncash donations.
  • Claiming losses on business ventures. Investors must pass several tests in order to be allowed to deduct a loss from a business venture. Some activities may not rise to the level of a business, such as raising horses, racing cars and farming, which may be characterized as hobby losses.
  • Energy credits. There have been several tax incentives allowed for alternate energy sources, which have specific requirements.
  • Offshore assets and banking. There are significant penalties for failing to report offshore financial assets. This has been a focus of the IRS for several years now.
  • Micro-Captive insurance companies. The tax law allows taxpayers to form their own insurance companies to manage their risks. The IRS has identified specific profiles of abusive captives and now requires additional information reporting for these companies.
  • Related party transactions. Transactions between related family members, owners and their companies are subject to certain limitations and reasonableness.

I always harken back to the quotes of the famous Tax Court Judge Learned Hand (yes that is his real name). He said:

“Any one may so arrange his affairs that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which will best pay the Treasury; there is not even a patriotic duty to increase one's taxes.”

“Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging one's affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of morals is mere cant.”

The tax law allows many advantageous tax planning strategies. The IRS should not undo or challenge a tax strategy simply because it results in a lower tax liability. At the same time, we have a responsibility to comply with the tax laws and maintain the required documentation to support our tax filings. We can help you be prepared to manage and plan to take full advantage of tax planning opportunities the law allows. We will also have your back should the IRS comes calling. After all, it is your money.

This is an HBK Tax Advisory Group publication.

Please indicate the industry that your company operates in: *

About the Author(s)
Jim is a Principal in the Tax Advisory Group in the Youngstown, Ohio office of HBK CPAs & Consultants and has been with the firm since 1986. He has extensive experience in personal and estate planning, charitable planning, tax-exempt organizations and individual tax and financial planning. Jim earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration for the University of Toledo and the Personal Financial Specialist (PFS) designation, which is awarded by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants to recognize CPAs who provide financial planning service. Jim also has experience in tax policies, procedures and resources, which HBK uses in their tax practices. He provides counsel to high-net worth individuals throughout HBK. He is one of the firm’s preeminent presenters and specializes in addressing business owners and individuals on topics such as the Affordable Care Act, Shale energy planning, charitable giving opportunities, estate and gift planning and exempt organization issues.
Hill, Barth & King LLC has prepared this material for informational purposes only. Any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or under any state or local tax law or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding the matter.